On 19/09/2006, at 2:52 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/18/06, jdiebremse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Isn't that not a tautology at all, but one of the basic assumptions about peer-review in science?Only for scientists who treat theories as if they were facts.
...'cause there's no such thing as something that is so well supported it can be considered a fact. Like gravity. Just a theory.
Charlie _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
