On 26 Oct 2006 at 13:14, Nick Arnett wrote: > On 10/26/06, Andrew Crystall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > And there are no outright "lies". I never said there were. What I > > actually said was that the fact over 700-800 shells with chemical > > weapon traces, more than the number which were believed he held (400- > > 500) is somehow NOT considered very newsworthy. > > > Have you notified the White House? I'm sure they'd be interested in knowing > that they don't know what's going on in Iraq with regard to chemical > weapons. There might be a reward!
How you bothered to actually read the evidence rather than taking the politicans spin? There might be some actual material proving my point! .. Stuff this, I don't need this list where idiots like YOU are going to deny that sarin shells have been found in Iraq despite EVERY piece of evidence and multiple declassified documents from the US Government refering to them. Have fun with your crackpot conspiracy theories, with Jonathon over there. AndrewC Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
