Bruce Bostwick wrote: > > So this is a complex question, because while the Tea Party does > technically have a leadership of sorts, it's a weak one, and there's > a lot of leaderless-cell activity underneath the surface that's not > at all like the public face of the party. And I'm not sure whether > that's a feature of the design, or an emergent property of its > population and the methods they use to communicate. I'm leaning > toward the latter, although the leadership certainly doesn't seem > to be too serious about doing anything other than enabling it and > diverting outside attention away from what's going on. > Bottom line: you don't think it's Intelligent Design, you think it's Natural Selection.
Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
