----------
> From: Gautam Mukunda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> --- The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That ~50% of of the male married population also
> > make.  
> 
> If 50% of the male married population is busily lying
> under oath, this is news to me.  If 50% of the male
> married population is under oath for any reason at
> all, this is news to me, actually.

Affairs.  Of the people who have affairs, I think a case can be made that
most of them lie about it, whether under oath or not.

> > Mr Brad Delong thinks differently:
> > 
> >
>
<<http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/2004_archives/001085.html>

> > >
> > 
> >
>
<<http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/2004_archives/001088.html>

> > >
> > 
> >
>
<<http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/2004_archives/001091.html>

> 
> I beg your pardon?  I don't know how well Brad knows
> Porter but Brad concurs with my opinion in the first
> post, and fudges that a bit in the last two without
> actually retracting it.  Quite categorically there is
> no way that Porter told Clinton to "cut the crap" and
> threatened him with personal destruction if he ran. 
> The whole idea is absurd...it's actually pretty funny,
> as anyone who knows Porter can tell you.  I started
> cracking up when I read about it, and I'm _still_
> laughing about it almost a week later.

"phone records for the White House for July 1991 presumably still exist."

Bob Woodward says the 1991 conversation occurred.  That he pressured
Clinton to switch parties...

Were you present when the alleged conversation occurred?  I am sure most
politicos have many faces they put on when they speak to different
people, particularly when pushing an agenda--which is alleged.  The same
way JDG's homophobic / Misogynist faces remain hidden behind his masks of
right-wing apologia.

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to