On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Clifford Yapp <[email protected]> wrote:
Well, minimally, be sure you schedule some time to work on implementing some
means of converting arbitrary CSG primitives to brep form - csgbrep is going to
be too inflexible for general testing. You'll want the basic primitive -> brep
ability early in the process, since it will be key to testing your results.
Now I have already add an option to the brep command in MGED, so that I can
use it to covert an arbitrary implicit primitive to brep, and the syntax is
just as what you said. The test of the conversion becomes much easier and more
convenient now. Thanks for your advises. As for this is still incomplete (I
would still modify it during the project, and the ability to convert a CSG tree
will be added, but it can be used now), I wonder whether it's suitable to make
it a patch (so that I can share it with others and they can use this feature).
What do you think?
Cheers!
Wu Jianbang
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
