On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:14:34PM EST, Dave Mielke wrote: > [quoted lines by Luke Yelavich on 2009/02/12 at 12:34 +1100] > > >Since there is lots thats changed, I would like to get something in before > >next Thursday at the latest, so at this point I think I'll grab latest svn, > >if > >its stable enough for regular use. Objections? > > No objections, and it should be safe for public use. It's taken me a while to > resolve a problem that one user was having, but that's been done now. > > Do you mean Thursday the 19th? I think I'm actually prepared to release 4.0 > with what we have now so the latest revision will essentially be the same as > what 4.0 will be. I can try to go through all the formal motions of releasing > 4.0 by the 19th if yu'd prefer, but if grabbing the latest revision is just > the > same for you then I'll feel freer to take my time.
I would actually rather get it in by the end of this week, so perhaps grabbing latest svn would be best, however if you are able to get a tarball ready by say Tuesday, I may be able to get that in by the 19th. At this point, I will go with whats in svn. Do you have any tight requirements on what autoconf/automake versions are needed to build the configure/makefile pieces? Thanks again Luke
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
