On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:31:59PM EST, Dave Mielke wrote: > [quoted lines by Luke Yelavich on 2009/02/12 at 14:23 +1100] > > >I would actually rather get it in by the end of this week, so perhaps > >grabbing > >latest svn would be best, however if you are able to get a tarball ready by > >say Tuesday, I may be able to get that in by the 19th. > > I'll try. Just for you, though, I'll consider 4.0 content to be frozen as of > now, other than documentation updates and last minute problems reported by > anyone. So, everyone who's reading this, please give the latest revision a > thorough test as soon as possible so that we can ensure that 4.0 is a quality > release.
Ok thanks, but I will just use svn, so no rush with the tarball. > >At this point, I will go with whats in svn. Do you have any tight > >requirements > >on what autoconf/automake versions are needed to build the > >configure/makefile > >pieces? > > We don't use automake. autoconf-2.53 is the earliest one we guarantee. If you > run into any problems then let me know and I'll try to accommodate them. Great, that suits me fine. Thanks again Luke
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
