> On Jun 6, 2016, at 9:46 PM, Robin Sommer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> That all looks consistent except part (2) ends up pointing people >> toward existing docs/examples that reference “package” but with a >> different meaning. I'd need a decision to be made about how/whether >> to change that. > > Ok, then let's rename "package" in the current docs. I propose > "module" as the replacement: it's not quite right regarding the > language's module concept but close enough I would say.
Or “bundle", which has even less baggage, but I think module is fine. > >> naming the project/client/containers > > My vote: Bro Package Manager, bro-pkgs, package. Only difference is I don’t think the client needs the plural. I would simply go to bro-pkg. ------ Adam J. Slagell Chief Information Security Officer Director, Cybersecurity Division National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign www.slagell.info "Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), any written communication to or from University employees regarding University business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure." _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
