> On Jun 7, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Siwek, Jon <jsi...@illinois.edu> wrote: > > I’d appreciate if anyone would think a bit about whether “package” still > actually makes sense to use in the current context and doesn’t actually need > a rename.
I can always repose this later if I’m struggling w/ using it in the docs, but I have my head wrapped around the various contexts it can be used in now that the design is changed, so I’m not blocked on it. I’d like to move forward w/ the following unless there’s still objections, open questions, or I misunderstood general consensus: project name: Bro Package Manager client name: bro-pkg git repo name: bro-pkg design spec/proposal: use Robin's/Johanna’s top-level container name: packages changes to existing naming conventions: none - Jon _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list bro-dev@bro.org http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
