On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 11:46 -0800, you wrote:
> That would mean we'd have new keywords: is, to, as. I find that's too > confusing and think we should go with either "to" or "as" but not both. Yeah, I agree, don't like that version anymore either. I have just committed a first implementation of the type-based switch that uses this syntax instead: case type string: .... case type count as c: .... What do you think of that? The additional "type" makes it visually clear what's it's about, and also helps the parser figure it out. Robin -- Robin Sommer * ICSI/LBNL * ro...@icir.org * www.icir.org/robin _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list bro-dev@bro.org http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev