On 13 Feb 2018, at 11:31, Robin Sommer wrote:
> We could even go a step further and compile CAF statically into > libbroker, so that in the end from a user's perspective all they deal > with is Broker: if they link against it, they get everything they > need. > > Would that make sense? I think we're quite a ways off from CAF being generally packaged with most operating systems (especially having the correct version to work with broker). I think that including it with broker and building libcaf into libbroker statically makes sense too. I've been concerned about the difficulty of building Bro from source too. .Seth -- Seth Hall * Corelight, Inc * www.corelight.com _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
