> On Feb 13, 2018, at 11:36 AM, Seth Hall <s...@corelight.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 13 Feb 2018, at 11:31, Robin Sommer wrote:
>
>> We could even go a step further and compile CAF statically into
>> libbroker, so that in the end from a user's perspective all they deal
>> with is Broker: if they link against it, they get everything they
>> need.
>>
>> Would that make sense?
>
> I think we're quite a ways off from CAF being generally packaged with
> most operating systems (especially having the correct version to work
> with broker). I think that including it with broker and building libcaf
> into libbroker statically makes sense too. I've been concerned about
> the difficulty of building Bro from source too.
>
> .Seth
This will also make
pip install pybroker
feasible, which would be a huge usability improvement for integrating external
systems with bro.
—
Justin Azoff
_______________________________________________
bro-dev mailing list
bro-dev@bro.org
http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
