-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Glenn wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:51:59 -0500, Bret Lambert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This is a convoluted subject. One person's standard is another
>> person's bugaboo. Frankly, I don't think that app-specific
>> knowledge should be required, unless it's a) integral to the
>> functioning of a network/system and b) ubiquitous (OpenSSH and
>> tcpdump come to mind as fitting both). Even if a tool meets the
>> above requirements, what if the tool accepts different arguments
>> on each BSD?
>
>
> The question is: if it's included in the default installation, is
> it not fair game to test one's knowledge of it? Are we certifying
> stricly BSD specific knowledge, or the ability to provision,
> deploy, administer, and monitor a BSD machine? Either way, if a
> tool included in the base system has different flags accorss
> different BSD's (a nitpick, but valid one nonetheless) then that's
> something a "BSD Certified Administrator" should be aware of, I
> believe.
Hi,
Effectively, if a tool is providing in the standard installation
why not
test a knowledge about it. But i think about sendmail, it is the MTA
by default.
Is it possible to test just the mechanism of a MTA in general and
about sendmail
in particular ?
With that, you can estimate the level in general configuration.
And i go to
read the archives to see if i repeat nobody.
Nissen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCQeDBpBQVMDdCNNcRAnwyAJ9xoHAJ8tEx/LJ51+IUNdFB3XKR7ACfVPuu
cQ0nE5Lj8Us0+EGJRF61dGU=
=hoaM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
BSDcert mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/bsdcert
