The difference between certification and professional
seems very blurred. here. In my opinion to be certified one need only to
prove they have a specific level of knowledge, this is an inventively
different discussion than professional. It is reasonable to assume that a
professional has the required level of knowledge but, they are expected to have
more. Not only demonstrated ethics but also a certain level of involvement
in an appropriate community is expected. I also have some
difficulty with how one would globally establish consistency when it comes to
matters such as the quality of the hour spent mentoring.
The closest parallel as I see it is while an engineer
may have graduated from a university and proven to their professors that
they have an adequate level of knowledge, they usually have to wait for several
years and have accumulated some experience and frequently are required to write
one or more exams on topics such as ethics. some areas also may require
other personal standards or evidence of continuing education. before they will
grant professional status. Other regularly recognised professional groups also
has similar procedures.
The danger as I see it is trying to make a
certification too broad sweeping. The challenge in setting a global
standard on just what comprises an appropriate level of knowledge is enough of a
challenge with out bring other "professional" aspects into the discussion.
Thinking of some that I have meet in the IT world, while they frequently have a
greater body of knowledge than I, there is no way they would be classified as
professional.
For the record I am a professional in another area, I
see my professional designation as entirely separate from the courses and exams
I took to establish my level of knowledge.
Norm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atom Powers
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BSDCert] Why Linux needs a mentor program
On 9/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is something the Group has considered for the "professional" (more advanced) certification and ties in a little bit to the recent discussion on pre-requisites (though that discussion was for the "associate" or less advanced exam).
What does this list think of requiring the "professional" candidate to do more than just pass an exam? As in, requiring another something such as:
- so many hours of involvement in one of the projects (assisting with docs, advocacy, ports/packages, resolving bugs, etc.)
- so many hours of mentoring (either on lists, IRC, in one's local community, in a user group, etc.)
- other (give suggestions here)
Dru
_______________________________________________
BSDCert mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/bsdcert
--
--
Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard.
--Atom Powers--
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG
Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/107 - Release Date:
9/20/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/107 - Release Date: 9/20/2005
_______________________________________________ BSDCert mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/bsdcert
