It looks like all the permissions issues have been sorted out and the website mostly updated now and the release archives put on the distribution server . The only left that I can see is to get the download page at http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_bsf.cgi to mention the 3.0 release. If I can work out how to get that done is there anything else we need to do before sending a belated official announcement email for the 3.0 beta2 release?
...ant On Nov 22, 2007 8:16 PM, Rony G. Flatscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > O.K. now I had been able to upload the bsf-3.0-beta2-* files to > </www/www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/bsf>! > > So hopefully now everything is in place for picking up the 2.4 and the > 3.0beta BSF packages. > > ---rony > > > > ant elder wrote: > > On Nov 22, 2007 9:34 AM, Ulf Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Ant said: > >> > >>> If we just return to the 2.4 status quo then the 3.0 releases will > never get > >>> announced, so unless someone feels particularly strongly about it i'd > rather > >>> leave it broken like this as at least then it prompts everyone to help > try > >>> to get 3.0 published properly. > >>> > >> Am I understanding correctly that you're proposing to leave the > download page as it is? > >> > > > > > > >Only until all the permissions problems get resolved, which sounds > like it wont be long. > > > > >(As an aside, I would argue that even after the 3.0 release, 2.4 should > remain available, and visibly linked to.) > > > > I agree with you, the 2.x and 3.x versions have completely different > APIs > > so some people will stay on 2.x for the foreseeable future and we > should > > keep both available. > > > > >
