On 9 July 2014 18:08, Jay Foad <jay.f...@gmail.com> wrote: Note that this would conflict with the use of ⍺⍺ and ⍵⍵ in NARS2000 > and Dyalog, where they refer to the operands of a defined operator. >
Yes, but those are called ⍹ and ⍶ on GNU APL, which makes more sense. > With three levels of nested lambdas would you also want to be able to > use ⍵⍵⍵ in the innermost one, to refer to the value of ⍵ in the > outermost one, and so on? > Yes, that would be nice, although less needed of course. :-) Regards, Elias
