On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 July 2014 22:15, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> 2. I'm not sure if I fully understand the conclusion of David's last >> longish email. It sounded like he is abandoning the old code and moving >> towards a GDBM solution. That sounds good, and I think there is likely a >> good fit. I also sensed that he is proposing to use his existing >> implementation to represent GNU APL's conforming Annex A implementation. >> Is that true? >> > > No. I believe he was saying he'd drop the non-SQLite support. My argument > was that he could change to GDBM instead of SQLite since GDBM matches his > vision much more closely. > > That's correct. Thanks, Elias. As far as the existing implementation being proposed as a reference implementation of Annex A: that's also correct and will remain so with or without the change from SQLite to any other storage layer. -- "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources." Albert Einstein http://soundcloud.com/davidlamkins http://reverbnation.com/lamkins http://reverbnation.com/lcw http://lamkins-guitar.com/ http://lamkins.net/ http://successful-lisp.com/
