The thing that started this is that GNU APL was not able to compile without the SQLite .h files. In other words, GNU APL requires SQLite. I think he wants it to only use SQLite when ./configure finds it.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> wrote: > Did you mean <sqlite3.h>? Then that is actually correct. ResultValue is > specific to the SQLite provider. If SQLite support is not enabled, that > file shouldn't be compiled. > > Perhaps it would be best if that file is renamed SqliteResultValue... > > Regards, > Elias > > > On 15 July 2014 01:36, Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> should be fixed in SVN 374. >> >> The sqlite should be optional - Elias, there is a >> >> *#include "apl-sqlite.hh"* >> >> in *ResultValue**.hh* - that looks wrong. >> >> *execinfo* is a separate lib on some platforms and part of *glibc* on >> others. >> It is OK if the test for it fails. >> >> /// Jürgen >> >> >> >> iOn 07/14/2014 02:37 PM, Blake McBride wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> I installed GNU APL on raw LinuxMint 16 and 17 and came up with the >> following differences from what is stated in the README-1-prerequisits >> file. Note that since LinuxMint is built on to of Ubuntu, Ubuntu installs >> should be the same. >> >> 1. Although ./configure worked out-of-the-box without warnings, APL >> did not build. It failed. In order to get it to build, I had to install >> the following packages (which were not checked/verified by the configure >> script, but are _required_): >> >> texinfo >> g++ >> libsqlite3-dev >> (should probably install sqlite3 too) >> >> >> Note that requiring sqlite3-dev is a surprise. >> >> 2. The list of suggested packages given in README-1-prerequisits is >> incorrect or out-of-date. It should be: >> >> liblapack-dev >> libreadline-dev (or libreadline6-dev) - there is no libreadline5-dev >> libncurses5-dev - there is no ncurses-dev >> libpq-dev (if PostgreSQL support is desired) >> >> 3. I noticed that the system can't find library execinfo. Where is >> that? (What package might that be in? I can't find it.) >> >> Thanks. >> >> Blake >> >> >> >
