Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Frank Küster (2006-04-18) writes: > >> I suggest to always add the star if the previous command was starred >> (and no prefix is given); if you think it's necessary the user should >> be able to customize that. > > I just looked at the code and extending it to support your > suggestion would be quite a challenge. AFAICS > `LaTeX-current-section', `LaTeX-down-section' and `LaTeX-up-section' > would all have to return more information than just the section > level. Namely the section name and a flag indicating if it is a > starred version. (Instead of providing a flag the star could be > part of the section name.) Juggling with a complex return value in > and between the functions mentioned above feels a bit odd and > kludgy, though.
Maybe it would make sense to allow section names "section*" and "section[" as reply to the C-c C-s query of the section level. A starred entry would not ask for a label, and a "section[" would ask for a toc entry (when using memoir, section[[ might ask for both toc entry and running header). -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
