* David Kastrup (2006-04-22) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> * Frank Küster (2006-04-18) writes: >> >>> I suggest to always add the star if the previous command was starred >>> (and no prefix is given); if you think it's necessary the user should >>> be able to customize that. >> >> I just looked at the code and extending it to support your >> suggestion would be quite a challenge. AFAICS >> `LaTeX-current-section', `LaTeX-down-section' and `LaTeX-up-section' >> would all have to return more information than just the section >> level. Namely the section name and a flag indicating if it is a >> starred version. (Instead of providing a flag the star could be >> part of the section name.) Juggling with a complex return value in >> and between the functions mentioned above feels a bit odd and >> kludgy, though. > > Maybe it would make sense to allow section names "section*" and > "section[" as reply to the C-c C-s query of the section level. A > starred entry would not ask for a label, and a "section[" would ask > for a toc entry (when using memoir, section[[ might ask for both toc > entry and running header).
Personally I'd find "section*" natural but "section[" a bit obscure. "section*" is something you can already use. Currently it just doesn't inhibit prompting for a label. For that one would have to temporarily remove `LaTeX-section-label' from `LaTeX-section-hook' or let-bind a variable which gets checked by `LaTeX-section-label'. But that doesn't help with the default-to-starred-section-if-section- before-was-starred-as-well business. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
