David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: [Sorry if that's a duplicate.]
>> So how about always using `TeX-read-string' and have a new option >> `TeX-read-string-inherit-input-method'? Next to nil/non-nil we could >> allow (lambda (prompt) ...) as a value, so users even had the chance >> to say "Don't inherit input method when reading >> sizes/positions/dates, etc." (assuming the prompts are informative >> enough). > > I don't see that this will magically buy us the consistency that > currently appears lacking. With a boolean value of `TeX-read-string-inherit-input-method' the input method is either always inherited or never inherited. To me that's consistent. With a lambda as a value, any inconsistencies are defined by the user. I think users can judge much better if and where they want to inherit the current input method than we can. After all, that depends on the current input method, the keyboard layout, the default input method, etc. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
