On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 09:14, Gustavo Barros <[email protected]>
wrote:
Anyway, I did some testing again. Again lightly, but I've tested now
indent,
it's interaction with `electric-indent', and filling. I considered
the
following cases: 1) the new fix for `LaTeX-back-to-indentation' by
itself; 2)
the new fix with the suggested change in
`LaTeX-fill-region-as-para-do' and
`LaTeX-fill-move-to-break-point'; 3) the new fix with the suggested
change in
`LaTeX-fill-region-as-para-do' and `LaTeX-fill-move-to-break-point'.
Biting my own tongue on the copy-paste critiques here. "3)" was meant to
be "the *first* fix with the suggested change in
`LaTeX-fill-region-as-para-do' and `LaTeX-fill-move-to-break-point'".
Best regards,
Gustavo.
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
