Gustavo Barros <[email protected]> writes: Hi Gustavo,
> Yesterday, after I wrote, I still did some digging. Considering > Emacs' and AUCTeX's codebases, `LaTeX-back-to-indentation' only occurs > in `latex.el'. Within it, there are four "bare" (no args) calls to > the function, two of them in `LaTeX-indent-line' which, as far as I > can tell, is as expected. The other two are in filling related > functions, one in `LaTeX-fill-region-as-para-do' the other in > `LaTeX-fill-move-to-break-point'. Perhaps those should receive an > explicit argument, so as to work as expected during filling, > regardless of what is happening on the side of indentation proper, so > as to make filling more resilient and independent from indent > behavior. WDYT? As far as I get it, calls in the form > `(LaTeX-back-to-indentation (if LaTeX-syntactic-comments 'inner > 'outer))' should reproduce exactly the previous state of things for > those two functions. I've made the args explicit now, even so explicit that it became one 'inner and one 'outer, so not depending on `LaTeX-syntactic-comments'. I've also added a test case for filling with syntactic comments including code comments. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
