Oups, sorry, I sent my previous email just before I saw this message! >>>>> Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Jean-François, >>> I'm not sure what is worse. The restriction to have at least >>> balanced $ also in comments, or the now very restrictive workaround >>> form. We'll see if someone complains because that breaks his >>> >>> % Workaround fix $. >>> >>> comment fixes. >> >> Hi Tassilo, sorry for causing all the trouble.
> Ah, always these users with their strange requirements and bogus > documents! ;-) >> I pulled your commit and it works. For me that's working solution. >> >> Would it make sense to apply these rules: >> >> 1. a $ in comments can never start math mode >> 2. but it can and will always stop math mode > Hm, at first I've thought that would be annoying but it seems to work > quite well. So I've pushed another commit implementing that. Please > report if that fits the bill. > Bye, > Tassilo > _______________________________________________ > bug-auctex mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
