Hello Tassilo=Keita-san
Le 12 mai 2021 à 08:49, Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> a écrit :
> Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
>
> Hi Ikumi,
>
>>> Would it make sense to apply these rules:
>>
>>> 1. a $ in comments can never start math mode
>>> 2. but it can and will always stop math mode
>>
>> That is a clean idea and, fortunately, easy to implment. Could you test
>> the attached patch?
>
> I've committed a completely identical patch an hour ago with a diff just
> in the comment explaining what we are doing. It's very encouraging when
> we both have the very same idea, so I think, it cannot be too wrong. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Tassilo
It is now revealed you are only one entity (perhaps an A.I. based
on quantum computing) pretending to be two humans only to
justify coverage of all time zones !
I have pulled the commit and it appears to work fine in my real-life
files (using doctex mode)
But I notice something weird when comparing effect on those two files
File A behaves as expected
% -*- mode: latex; -*-
%
\def\foo_with_underscore{}
\newcommand\foo{$}%
% a comment
A foo_bar^bar{$}
% a comment
B foo_bar^bar{$}
% a comment
C foo_bar^bar
$
%
%
File B seems to have a problem
% -*- mode: latex; -*-
%
\def\foo_with_underscore{}
\newcommand\foo{$}%$
% a comment
A foo_bar^bar{$}
% a comment
B foo_bar^bar{$}
% a comment
C foo_bar^bar
$
%
%
In case of file B, which differs only by an added %$ at end of the \newcommand
line,
the \newcommand for example is not highlighted
and the B line changes colors without applying script style,
see screenshot
In case of file B I was expecting the B line to be styled in math mode,
it only has its color it seems,
and I was not expecting \newcommand\foo to lose its highlighting,
Perhaps this is a symptom of something else?
Best,
Jean-François
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
