> A brief testing didn't show fatal behavior. Here are two notes I noticed: > 1. In indirect buffer, preview-latex doesn't work. All preview images > appear in the base buffer. > 2. TeX Fold mode works independently in indirect and base buffers. > > I suppose there will be dissatisfied users about item 1. Do you have any > good idea about it? > Item 2 can be a useful feature rather than a shortcoming, whereas some > users want to inherit the folded appearance when they clone a buffer. > > Maybe we should regard these points as feature and announce them as > "known limitations". >
I'd be happy to take a quick look at this if I could see the patch in question. (I've been using indirect buffers with my local copy of preview-latex for years. The key point, if I recall correctly, was to trick "preview-region" into thinking it's being called in "non-file" mode, so that "<none>" gets passed along to preview-parse-messages and hence the previews are placed (correctly) in the command buffer rather than (incorrectly, as you've observed here) in the buffer with the same name as the master file.) _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
