Messages by Date
-
2012/08/07
Autoconf AC_CHECK_SIZEOF always 0 on CentOS
Inge Henriksen
-
2012/08/07
Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/08/06
Re: Folder naming bug.
Eric Blake
-
2012/08/06
Re: [FYI] {maint} tests: avoid spurious failure of 't/uninstall-fail.sh' on OpenIndiana
Eric Blake
-
2012/08/01
Re: ampersand in path name
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/31
ampersand in path name
K Richard Pixley
-
2012/07/26
Re: ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/26
ax_cxx_gcc_abi_demangle.m4: missing header
Andriy Gapon
-
2012/07/25
Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support
James Smith
-
2012/07/25
Re: fail to run aclocal
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/25
fail to run aclocal
Xuanye An
-
2012/07/25
Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/07/25
Re: test -z and test -n DESTDIR support
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/24
test -z and test -n DESTDIR support
James Smith
-
2012/07/23
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Karl Berry
-
2012/07/23
Re: Possible typo in Autoconf manual
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/21
Possible typo in Autoconf manual
Edward Chernenko
-
2012/07/21
[sr #108092] AC_PROG_GREP can select /usr/xpg4/bin/grep under Solaris 9 but it doesn't support long lines
Yann Rouillard
-
2012/07/21
Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests
Václav Zeman
-
2012/07/21
Autoconf testsuite failure (likely spurious) with the development version of Automake
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/07/21
Re: "-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests
Mike Frysinger
-
2012/07/21
"-v" in CFLAGS breaks autoconf -fPIC and some other tests
Knut Petersen
-
2012/07/19
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/19
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eli Zaretskii
-
2012/07/19
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/19
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/07/18
Re: IFS clobbering
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/18
Re: IFS clobbering
Andreas Schwab
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eli Zaretskii
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eli Zaretskii
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eli Zaretskii
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eli Zaretskii
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/18
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/17
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/17
Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf
gilles . charabot
-
2012/07/17
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eli Zaretskii
-
2012/07/17
Re: Fwd: Re: bug version number of autoconf
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/17
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/17
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/17
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eli Zaretskii
-
2012/07/17
Re: bug version bug-autoconf
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/17
bug version bug-autoconf
gilles . charabot
-
2012/07/17
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/16
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Eli Zaretskii
-
2012/07/16
Re: CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Patrice Dumas
-
2012/07/16
CVS Texinfo fails to build the Autoconf manual (from git)
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/07/15
[GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 270 273 274 276 277 278 279 ...
Perry Smith
-
2012/07/13
Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/13
Re: [PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK
Paul Eggert
-
2012/07/13
[PATCH] m4sh: avoid // issues in _AS_PATH_WALK
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/13
Re: test -f //dot
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/04
Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/07/04
Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/07/04
Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/07/04
Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/04
Re: [PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument
Eric Blake
-
2012/07/04
[PATCH 1/2] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR: accept more than one argument
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/07/04
[PATCH 2/2] docs: ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS will become obsolescent in Automake 1.13
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/07/04
Re: [PATCH] {master} aclocal: deprecate ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS, trace AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR instead
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/06/30
Re: Autoconf should allow the developer to require a POSIX shell
Paul Eggert
-
2012/06/28
Autoconf should allow the developer to require a POSIX shell
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/06/28
Re: bug#11793: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/06/27
Re: bug#11793: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented
Eric Blake
-
2012/06/26
Re: [PATCH] t9010: Open backflow FIFO once to work around kernel race condition
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/06/26
Re: bug#11793: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/06/26
Re: AM_MISSING_PROG undocumented
Eric Blake
-
2012/06/20
Re: [bug-gzip] gzip-1.5 test failures on FreeBSD 9.0 and NetBSD 5.1
Eric Blake
-
2012/06/20
Re: [bug-gzip] gzip-1.5 test failures on FreeBSD 9.0 and NetBSD 5.1
Paul Eggert
-
2012/06/20
Re: [bug-gzip] gzip-1.5 test failures on FreeBSD 9.0 and NetBSD 5.1
Eric Blake
-
2012/06/15
[with patch] Use -### instead of -v to detect linker options
Jeroen Demeyer
-
2012/05/07
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.63] testsuite: 1 8 9 10 12 14 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 50 133 136 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 failed, 91 passed unexpectedly
Eric Blake
-
2012/05/02
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 233 298 436 454 482 failed
Eric Blake
-
2012/05/01
Re: Autoconf on-line manual not updated to 2.69
Eric Blake
-
2012/05/01
Re: Autoconf on-line manual not updated to 2.69
Eric Blake
-
2012/05/01
Autoconf on-line manual not updated to 2.69
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/04/27
Re: _AC_PROG_{CC,CXX}_G and unwanted -O2 switch
Mike Frysinger
-
2012/04/27
_AC_PROG_{CC,CXX}_G and unwanted -O2 switch
Václav Zeman
-
2012/04/26
Re: autoconf implementation for powl()
Eric Blake
-
2012/04/26
autoconf implementation for powl()
Tom Vijlbrief
-
2012/04/26
Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5
Eric Blake
-
2012/04/26
go.m4 in autoconf-2.69 assumes old os.Open API
Adam Sampson
-
2012/04/26
Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5
Michael Olbrich
-
2012/04/26
Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5
Michael Olbrich
-
2012/04/25
Re: AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5
Eric Blake
-
2012/04/25
AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF fails when cross-compiling with gcc >= 4.5
Michael Olbrich
-
2012/04/25
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 231 failed
Bruno Haible
-
2012/04/25
[GNU Autoconf 2.69] testsuite: 231 failed
Bruno Haible
-
2012/04/24
GNU autoconf 2.69 released [stable]
Eric Blake
-
2012/04/23
[sr #108033] checking how to run the C preprocessor does not work
Eric Blake
-
2012/04/21
[sr #108033] checking how to run the C preprocessor does not work
Vincent Belaïche
-
2012/04/21
[sr #108032] a.exe erronously detected by Avast! antivirus as a Win32 Trojan generator
Vincent Belaïche
-
2012/04/17
Problem with aclocal
rajeshwari b
-
2012/04/17
[no subject]
rajeshwari b
-
2012/04/12
Re: Removal of double check from AC_CHECK_HEADER (was Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe...)
Paul Eggert
-
2012/04/12
Re: socket code on Windows (was: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore)
Zack Weinberg
-
2012/04/12
socket code on Windows (was: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore)
Russ Allbery
-
2012/04/12
Removal of double check from AC_CHECK_HEADER (was Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe...)
Zack Weinberg
-
2012/04/09
Installing gcc on Mac OS X
Asad, Randa (asadrs)
-
2012/04/07
[sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files
David A. Wheeler
-
2012/04/04
Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore
Paul Eggert
-
2012/04/04
Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore
Zack Weinberg
-
2012/04/04
Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore
Russ Allbery
-
2012/04/04
Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore
Zack Weinberg
-
2012/04/04
Re: AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore
Paul Eggert
-
2012/04/04
AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT does not need to probe for headers that are part of C89 or POSIX.1 anymore
Zack Weinberg
-
2012/03/26
autoconf bug report
yanjing.guo
-
2012/03/22
Re: AC_C_CONST is sensitive about -W -Wall -Werror CFLAGS.
Artur R. Czechowski
-
2012/03/22
Re: AC_C_CONST is sensitive about -W -Wall -Werror CFLAGS.
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/20
Re: [bug-autoconf] autoconf-2.68b comment
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/20
[bug-autoconf] autoconf-2.68b comment
Nelson H. F. Beebe
-
2012/03/18
Re: [sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files
David A. Wheeler
-
2012/03/18
[sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files
David A. Wheeler
-
2012/03/18
[sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files
David A. Wheeler
-
2012/03/16
[sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/15
[sr #107986] autoconf should reject or specifically warn about obviously wrong configure.ac files
anonymous
-
2012/03/08
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 251 285 286 failed (was Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 251 285 286 failed)
Václav Zeman
-
2012/03/08
broken grep on MacOS X [was: Autoconf-2.68b possible patch for FreeBSD, MacOS X]
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/07
Re: Autoconf-2.68b possible patch for FreeBSD, MacOS X
P. Martin
-
2012/03/07
Re: Autoconf-2.68b possible patch for FreeBSD, MacOS X
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/07
Re: Autoconf-2.68b possible patch for FreeBSD, MacOS X
P. Martin
-
2012/03/07
Re: Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 1 10 11 12 14 16 17 20 22 24 25 27 28 32 33 36 38 208 211 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 277 278 279 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 485 failed
P. Martin
-
2012/03/07
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 1 10 11 12 14 16 17 20 22 24 25 27 28 32 33 36 38 208 211 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 277 278 279 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 485 failed
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/07
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 1 10 11 12 14 16 17 20 22 24 25 27 28 32 33 36 38 208 211 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 277 278 279 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 485 failed
Peter O'Gorman
-
2012/03/07
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 1 10 11 12 14 16 17 20 22 24 25 27 28 32 33 36 38 208 211 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 277 278 279 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 485 failed
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/07
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 1 10 11 12 14 16 17 20 22 24 25 27 28 32 33 36 38 208 211 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 277 278 279 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 485 failed
Peter O'Gorman
-
2012/03/07
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 1 10 11 12 14 16 17 20 22 24 25 27 28 32 33 36 38 208 211 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 277 278 279 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 485 failed
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/07
Re: Autoconf-2.68b possible patch for FreeBSD, MacOS X
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/06
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 1 10 11 12 14 16 17 20 22 24 25 27 28 32 33 36 38 208 211 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 277 278 279 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 485 failed
Martin & Dunja Zaun
-
2012/03/06
Re: Autoconf-2.68b possible patch for FreeBSD, MacOS X
P. Martin
-
2012/03/06
Autoconf-2.68b possible patch for FreeBSD, MacOS X
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/06
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 1 10 11 12 14 16 17 20 22 24 25 27 28 32 33 36 38 208 211 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 277 278 279 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 485 failed
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/06
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 454 479 failed
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/05
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 305 433 failed
P. Martin
-
2012/03/05
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 305 433 failed
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/05
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 251 285 286 failed
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/05
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 305 433 failed
Dipl. Inform. Samuel John
-
2012/03/05
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 305 433 failed
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/04
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 & random others failed - osx lion bash
P. Martin
-
2012/03/04
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 & random others failed - osx lion bash
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/04
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 84 failed
Tim Rice
-
2012/03/04
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 100 & random others failed - osx lion bash
P. Martin
-
2012/03/04
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 84 failed
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/04
[GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 84 failed
Tim Rice
-
2012/03/04
Re: [PATCH] tests: fix spurious failure due to Solaris XPG4 sh bug
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/03/04
Re: [PATCH] tests: fix spurious failure due to Solaris XPG4 sh bug
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/04
[PATCH] tests: fix spurious failure due to Solaris XPG4 sh bug (was: Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b.7-3b78f] testsuite: 74 75 209 failed)
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/03/04
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b.7-3b78f] testsuite: 74 75 209 failed
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/03/03
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68.147-cca28] testsuite: 100 failed
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/03
Re: autoconf-2.68b/tests/m4sh.at
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/03
autoconf-2.68b/tests/m4sh.at
Tim Rice
-
2012/03/03
Re: Issues with automatic re-execution of configure with CONFIG_SHELL (was: Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta])
Tim Rice
-
2012/03/03
Re: Issues with automatic re-execution of configure with CONFIG_SHELL
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/03/03
Re: Issues with automatic re-execution of configure with CONFIG_SHELL
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/03
Issues with automatic re-execution of configure with CONFIG_SHELL (was: Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta])
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/03/02
Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta]
Tim Rice
-
2012/03/02
Re: bug#10925: Perl version problem in autoconf-2.68b
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/03/02
Re: bug#10925: Perl version problem in autoconf-2.68b
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/02
Re: bug#10925: Perl version problem in autoconf-2.68b
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/03/02
Re: bug#10925: Perl version problem in autoconf-2.68b
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/02
Re: bug#10925: Perl version problem in autoconf-2.68b
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/03/02
Re: Perl version problem in autoconf-2.68b
Eric Blake
-
2012/03/02
configure from autoconf 2.68b loops on NetBSD 5.1 amd64 (test 75) (was: Re: autoconf 2.68b loops on Solaris 10 sparc (test 75))
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/03/01
autoconf 2.68b loops on Solaris 10 sparc (test 75)
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/01
Perl version problem in autoconf-2.68b
Paul Eggert
-
2012/03/01
autoconf-2.68b released [beta]
Eric Blake
-
2012/02/22
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 419 444 failed - OSX Lion + llvm-gcc
Paul Eggert
-
2012/02/21
AC_PROG_CC mistaken clang for GCC (was: Re: bug#10859: 1.11a head on OSX Lion with Clang - 173 fails 87 skips of 2854 tests)
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/02/19
Re: [PATCH] parallel-tests: fix another BSD parallel make issue
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/02/18
Re: [PATCH] parallel-tests: fix another BSD parallel make issue
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/02/18
Re: bug#10819: [BUG][RM]
Eric Blake
-
2012/02/18
[PATCH] parallel-tests: fix another BSD parallel make issue
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/02/16
Re: bug#10819: [BUG][RM]
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/02/16
Re: bug#10819: [BUG][RM]
Eric Blake
-
2012/02/16
Re: bug#10819: [BUG][RM]
Philip Rowlands
-
2012/02/16
POSIX will say running "rm -f" with no argument is OK
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/02/16
Re: bug#10819: [BUG][RM]
Eric Blake
-
2012/02/08
Re: bug#10766: CXX gets the value 'CC' on Cygwin, but CC is in fact cc
Peter Rosin
-
2012/02/08
Re: bug#10766: CXX gets the value 'CC' on Cygwin, but CC is in fact cc
Stefano Lattarini
-
2012/01/29
Re: [Mingw-users] MinGW's awk 3.1.7, config.status, and CRLF issues
Eli Zaretskii
-
2012/01/29
Re: [Mingw-users] MinGW's awk 3.1.7, config.status, and CRLF issues
Werner LEMBERG
-
2012/01/29
MinGW's awk 3.1.7, config.status, and CRLF issues
Werner LEMBERG
-
2012/01/26
Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF fails with minGW
Mike Frysinger
-
2012/01/26
Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF fails with minGW
Paul Eggert
-
2012/01/26
Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF fails with minGW
Mike Frysinger
-
2012/01/26
Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF fails with minGW
Paul Eggert
-
2012/01/26
AC_CHECK_SIZEOF fails with minGW
Werner LEMBERG
-
2012/01/24
Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC
Joseph S. Myers
-
2012/01/22
Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68] testsuite: 14 17 22 24 25 33 37 208 211 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 227 228 229 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 249 250 254 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 272 273 27
Matias Seco
-
2012/01/20
Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC
Peter Rosin
-
2012/01/19
Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC
Dave Korn
-
2012/01/19
RE: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC
Paul_Koning
-
2012/01/19
Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC
Ludovic Courtès