On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org> wrote:
> > What's the bug? They are equivalent. > It's not a bad thing if we can make the language a bit more elegant unless the cost is not worth it. > > If you mean "I would like bash to perform a second optimization pass > over the result of ${var@Q} so that it's prettier in my degenerate edge > cases", I suspect there are better uses of Chet's time, but it's his call. > It's not necessarily to perform a second pass parsing. -clark