On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:27:13PM +0800, konsolebox wrote: > I looked at this code plenty of times and I really think the returned > value to expand_assignment_string_to_string (v, 0) needs to be freed > too when aval != 0. > > ...
The patch seems to be correct. Moreover, I think that the line aval = expand_assignment_string_to_string (v, 0); should be moved down below the next if-statement. Because of the continue, there is a memory leak. Regards, Mike Jonkmans