On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:27:13PM +0800, konsolebox wrote:
> I looked at this code plenty of times and I really think the returned
> value to expand_assignment_string_to_string (v, 0) needs to be freed
> too when aval != 0.
> 
> ...

The patch seems to be correct.

Moreover, I think that the line
        aval = expand_assignment_string_to_string (v, 0);
should be moved down below the next if-statement.

Because of the continue, there is a memory leak.

Regards, Mike Jonkmans

Reply via email to