On 4/19/21 3:22 PM, Mike Jonkmans wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:27:13PM +0800, konsolebox wrote:
I looked at this code plenty of times and I really think the returned
value to expand_assignment_string_to_string (v, 0) needs to be freed
too when aval != 0.
...
The patch seems to be correct.
Moreover, I think that the line
aval = expand_assignment_string_to_string (v, 0);
should be moved down below the next if-statement.
Because of the continue, there is a memory leak.
Good catch.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
