Re: About fltexpr

[Duncan Roe via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell]

On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 09:51:49PM +0200, Bash development wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 22:39:29 +0300 Oğuz wrote:
> > > Could fltexpr maybe link to some other libm that is correctly rounded,
> > > like GNU MPFR, or LLVM's libm, to mention just a few?
> >
> > What would be the point of that? Use bc if you need more precision
>
> If think for a moment, you'll realize that my question was different
> than what you answered.
>
> And as to your question, the point would be the same as having fltexpr
> in the first place, rather than shelling out to external commands.
>
>
What external command did you have in mind? printf is a shell builtin