Sep 21, 2025, 19:33 by [email protected]: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 09:51:49PM +0200, Bash development wrote: > >> On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 22:39:29 +0300 Oğuz wrote: >> > > Could fltexpr maybe link to some other libm that is correctly rounded, >> > > like GNU MPFR, or LLVM's libm, to mention just a few? >> > >> > What would be the point of that? Use bc if you need more precision >> >> If think for a moment, you'll realize that my question was different >> than what you answered. >> >> And as to your question, the point would be the same as having fltexpr >> in the first place, rather than shelling out to external commands. >> > What external command did you have in mind? printf is a shell builtin > What external command? It's in what you quoted: He suggests I use bc.
Re: About fltexpr
pourko--- via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell Sun, 21 Sep 2025 17:40:54 -0700
- About fltexpr pourko--- via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
- Re: About f... Greg Wooledge
- Re: About f... Lawrence Velázquez
- Re: Abo... pourko--- via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
- Re:... Duncan Roe via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
- Re: About f... pourko--- via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
- Re: Abo... Oğuz
- Re: Abo... Andreas Schwab
- Re: About f... pourko--- via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
- Re: Abo... Lawrence Velázquez
