------- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-04-24 13:25 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The important thing is that executables and PIEs are always the first in the > symbol search scope, so the linker can compute the offsets within the TLS > block > at runtime. For shared libraries you can't do that, as you don't know how big > the executable or PIE's TLS block will be, what alignment will it need etc., > so for those you need a runtime relocation. >
Can you add those comments in your patch? Also please add a testcase for each change. Your testcase only shows R_X86_64_TPOFF32 is affected. But your proposed change affects many other TLS relocations. Are they really necessary? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6443 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
