------- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-04-24 13:56 ------- Subject: Re: -pie issues with TLS relocations
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:46 AM, jakub at redhat dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2008-04-24 13:46 > ------- > That's certainly not enough, see the testcase I've provided. There are > various > relocations: > 0000000000000003 0000000b00000016 R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF 0000000000000008 c > + > fffffffffffffffc > 000000000000000c 0000000c00000017 R_X86_64_TPOFF32 0000000000000000 a > + 0 > 0000000000000014 0000000d00000017 R_X86_64_TPOFF32 0000000000000004 b > + 0 > 000000000000001e 0000000e00000014 R_X86_64_TLSLD 000000000000000c d > + > fffffffffffffffc > 0000000000000023 0000000f00000004 R_X86_64_PLT32 0000000000000000 > __tls_get_addr + fffffffffffffffc > 0000000000000029 0000000e00000015 R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 000000000000000c d > + 0 > 0000000000000031 0000001000000013 R_X86_64_TLSGD 0000000000000010 e > + > fffffffffffffffc > 0000000000000039 0000000f00000004 R_X86_64_PLT32 0000000000000000 > __tls_get_addr + fffffffffffffffc > and all of them can and should be in a PIE transitioned to the fastest, > local-exec, ones, as all resolve to a symbol within the PIE. > Please add testcases to your patch to make sure that only necessary changes are included. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6443 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
