https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20343
--- Comment #9 from dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot org <dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot org> --- When the bfd-plugins directory looks like: me@home:/usr/local/lib/bfd-plugins# ls -l total 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 14 Jul 21 15:11 LLVMgold.so -> ../LLVMgold.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 71 Jul 10 17:56 liblto_plugin.so.0.0.0 -> /usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.1.1/liblto_plugin.so.0.0.0* How does "nm t.o" decide, if it shall open liblto_plugin or LLVMgold to proceed the .o file? Why does ld proceed in a different way? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils