https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20343
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> --- (In reply to dilyan.palau...@aegee.org from comment #9) > When the bfd-plugins directory looks like: > > me@home:/usr/local/lib/bfd-plugins# ls -l > total 4 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 14 Jul 21 15:11 LLVMgold.so -> ../LLVMgold.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 71 Jul 10 17:56 liblto_plugin.so.0.0.0 -> > /usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.1.1/liblto_plugin.so.0.0.0* > > > How does "nm t.o" decide, if it shall open liblto_plugin or LLVMgold to > proceed the .o file? It tries them in alphabetic order. The first plugin that claims the object in question gets used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
