> Le 16 oct. 2018 à 14:57, Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> a écrit : > > The minimal example below compiles with clang++6, but not with g++8. One > would think that it should define a qualified name B::A, used as > mu::B::A a; > as in the other cases below. But I have it probably by legacy since when > Bison used YYSTYPE only, though. Concretely, it is my understanding that this is irrelevant to Bison, isn’t it?
- Bison 3.1 api.value.type {semantic_type} error in gcc8 Hans Åberg
- Re: Bison 3.1 api.value.type {semantic_type} error in g... Akim Demaille
- Re: Bison 3.1 api.value.type {semantic_type} error in g... Akim Demaille
- Re: Bison 3.1 api.value.type {semantic_type} error ... Hans Åberg
- Re: Bison 3.1 api.value.type {semantic_type} er... Akim Demaille
- Re: Bison 3.1 api.value.type {semantic_type... Hans Åberg
- Re: Bison 3.1 api.value.type {semantic_type... Hans Åberg
- Re: Bison 3.1 api.value.type {semantic_type... Hans Åberg