> On 16 Oct 2018, at 18:21, Akim Demaille <a...@lrde.epita.fr> wrote: > >> Le 16 oct. 2018 à 14:57, Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> a écrit : >> >> The minimal example below compiles with clang++6, but not with g++8. One >> would think that it should define a qualified name B::A, used as >> mu::B::A a; >> as in the other cases below. But I have it probably by legacy since when >> Bison used YYSTYPE only, though. > > Concretely, it is my understanding that this is irrelevant > to Bison, isn’t it?
I think it is a g++8 bug, and for Bison, it is restricted to using that name, so very limited.
