Kenichi Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I just checked, 4.1 has already all support. Sorry for confusion. > > I see. But, anyway, "ls (coreutils) 4.5.4" has a bug. If > this version of "ls" is already widely spread, shouldn't > Emacs pay special attention to such a buggy "ls"?
FYI, I've just released coreutils-4.5.5. The announcement went to a couple of lists; it takes a while to reach the GNU archives http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/coreutils-announce http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils-announce/ (archives) Hmm. I see that it has already reached this archive: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.fileutils.bugs/561 The sources are here: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-4.5.5.tar.bz2 _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
