can anyone confirm this ? on my systems (tested Gentoo and Fedora) with glibc-2.5, the example file is not sorted properly while on systems running glibc-2.4, it is sorted properly ... coreutil-5.97 through coreutils-6.7 (and cvs) seem to show the same behavior
$ cat sortme /dev udev tmpfs rw,nosuid /dev/shm none tmpfs rw / /dev/root reiserfs rw,noatime /dev/pts devpts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec [ works ] $ /lib/libc.so.6 | head -n 1 GNU C Library development release version 2.4, by Roland McGrath et al. $ sort sortme / /dev/root reiserfs rw,noatime /dev udev tmpfs rw,nosuid /dev/pts devpts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec /dev/shm none tmpfs rw [ fails ] $ /lib/libc.so.6 | head -n 1 GNU C Library stable release version 2.5, by Roland McGrath et al. /dev/pts devpts devpts rw,nosuid,noexec / /dev/root reiserfs rw,noatime /dev/shm none tmpfs rw /dev udev tmpfs rw,nosuid -mike
pgpUdnnuBdPpq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
