sai nagendra bhavani prasad wrote:
We found a scenario while testing "ls" command in linux (Linux 2.4.20-8 #1 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux). We got same results for "ls -la" and "ll",where as "ll" command is NOT found in the manual pages.
That shouldn't happen. Many systems create an alias 'll="ls -l"' (which is why it has no man page), but 'ls -l' != 'ls -la'. At the very minimum -la will show you also '.' and '..'.
kindlly revert back ASAP.
Revert what? Is adding 'unalias ll' to your .profile what you want? -- Matthew find / -user your -name base -print | xargs chown us:us _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
