sai nagendra bhavani prasad wrote: > We found a scenario while testing "ls" command in linux (Linux > 2.4.20-8 #1 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux). We got same results for "ls > -la" and "ll", where as "ll" command is NOT found in the manual > pages. > > kindlly revert back ASAP.
Your reported generated discussion that you may read using the following URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-05/msg00117.html The belief is that many software distributors provide a pre-existing alias 'll="ls -l"'. The 'll' command is not part of GNU coreutils. (Although it is a traditionally included command for many Unix systems.) Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
