Michael Geng wrote: > I would expect Genparse to generate faster code than argp because it does > part of the work at compile time while argp does everything at run time > since it's a library function.
Is the performance of parsing program arguments really a concern? I would think that the difference would not be significant. I would value clean code over minor performance improvements. For coreutils I would value object code size over performance. Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
