Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Should we be additionally calling usage (EXIT_FAILURE); where now > error() with first argument as EXIT_FAILURE is being invoked?
On one hand, I'm tempted to say if the user uses -f with a format string containing no % directive at all, then maybe they need to look at --help output, so maybe calling "usage" would be good. On the other hand, I have personally wanted to use seq with a format string containing *no* % directive (hence the TODO item to consider allowing that). _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
