Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks for working on that. > > Attached is a revised patch that should take "appropriately" care of > your suggestions. I ran make check and all tests passed. Furthermore, > I checked coreutils.texi, but there seems to be no relevant documentation > for seq with regard to diagnostics (as expected). FYI, make distcheck > ungracefully exits with "fuzzy patch".
Thanks again. I've pushed this. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
