Bo Borgerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> I found "strict_newlines" to be a little unclear. >> If you use something like "ignore_newlines" instead, that's not >> only clearer to me, but with its reversed semantics it also lets >> you avoid three negations. > > Thanks, that's much nicer. > > The attached patch contains this change and is rebased against the > current HEAD. > > I've also made this available via: > > $ git fetch git://repo.or.cz/coreutils/bo.git base64-merge:base64-merge ... >>From 9131d82c32e00b606eb79d083ef8309178460ac5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Bo Borgerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:40:38 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] An upstream compatible base64 > > * gl/lib/base64.c (base64_decode_ctx): If no context structure was passed in, > treat newlines as garbage (this is the historical behavior). Formerly > base64_decode. > (base64_decode_alloc_ctx): Formerly base64_decode_alloc. > * gl/lib/base64.h (base64_decode): Macro for four-argument calls. > (base64_decode_alloc): Likewise. > * src/base64.c (do_decode): Call base64_decode_ctx instead of base64_decode.
Thanks. I've applied and pushed that. With that, updating from gnulib (assuming no changes required there) will be a no-op. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
