On 01/24/2014 04:09 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 01/24/2014 02:46 AM, Assaf Gordon wrote: >> $ getent group | grep ^users >> users:x:100: >> users:x:1000:www-data,XXX,YYY >> === > > Oh right, grep ^$id_gn: it is so. > > Note we can't rely on getent(1) being available (as noted in bug 9987), > but the failure in that edge case is still a skip as the count will be 0 then.
I'm still not convinced that we should mask this misconfiguration by skipping the test. AFAIK it's totally valid to have several names for a gid, but is it permitted the other way round? I'd bet you run into other trouble on such a system, too. Therefore, I see the failing test more as a heads-up to fix the configuration. Thanks & have a nice day, Berny
