Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello, Derek!
>
> > > I don't understand what you mean, but probably we are talking about
> > > different things. If you are linking against libfoo and it depends on
> >
> > No, I don't think we were.talking about different things. I meant that when a
> > Libtool lib gets installed that it installs a metadata file called libx.la (where x
> > is package-dependant), then shoves the "real" libx.a & libx.so files in a '.libs'
> > directory where they, in theory, won't be noticed.
>
> If the word "installed" is indeed what you meant to say, it must be a very
> serious bug in Libtool that I have never observed.
Hey Pavel. :)
Whoops. I guess it's not a problem then. Like I said, my knowledge of Libtool is
still
sketchy. I believe what I described is what happens during the build of a project, and
I assumed from your description of Libtool as, "viral", that the same behavior would be
evident on install.
My apologies, but I think what I said still applies to the viral creep of Libtool
inside
projects?
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
Spitwads are not free speech.
Spitwads are not free speech.
Spitwads are not free speech...
- Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
