Derek R. Price writes:
>
> I just checked in a README.DOCS file in the doc directory. I didn't document much
> more that what I just sent in email but it seemed like a step in the right
> direction. I'm going to rename it HACKING.DOCS in a minute, though.
Do we really want to be in the business of (partially) reproducing
texinfo documentation? It seems to me that it would be better to just
tell people to go read the texinfo manual:
http://www.gnu.org/manual/texinfo/texinfo.html
-Larry Jones
TIME?! I just finished the first problem! -- Calvin
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
