Larry Jones wrote:
> Derek R. Price writes:
> >
> > I just checked in a README.DOCS file in the doc directory. I didn't document much
> > more that what I just sent in email but it seemed like a step in the right
> > direction. I'm going to rename it HACKING.DOCS in a minute, though.
>
> Do we really want to be in the business of (partially) reproducing
> texinfo documentation? It seems to me that it would be better to just
> tell people to go read the texinfo manual:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/manual/texinfo/texinfo.html
I'm thinking that what I dropped in doc is a convenient quick-start for those daunted
by reading the whole manual when such a small subset is enough for producing passable
documentation. I added the texinfo documentation link to the manual to the file,
though.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CollabNet ( http://collab.net )
--
I will not grease the monkey bars.
I will not grease the monkey bars.
I will not grease the monkey bars...
- Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
